Are Christians Allowed to Use AI? Theological Perspectives and Practical Guidelines for Ministry

Theological Foundations Affirm Responsible AI Use

Christian theology provides robust support for AI development and use through several biblical principles. The dominion mandate of Genesis 1:26-28—where God commands humanity to "subdue" the earth and have "dominion" over creation—is widely interpreted as encompassing technological innovation, including AI. Christ Over All The 2019 Evangelical Statement on AI explicitly states: "We affirm that the development of AI is a demonstration of the unique creative abilities of human beings. When AI is employed in accordance with God's moral will, it is an example of man's obedience to the divine command to steward creation." The Gospel Coalition Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission

The biblical concept of stewardship provides the ethical framework most Christians apply to AI. Drawing from passages like Matthew 25:14-30 (the parable of the talents) and 1 Corinthians 4:2 ("It is required that those who have been given a trust must prove faithful"), theologians argue that Christians have a responsibility to use technological gifts wisely for human flourishing. Regent University's Center for Christian Thought emphasizes that Genesis 1:28 "calls humanity to exercise dominion over the earth, which includes the responsible use of technology. AI has the potential to solve complex societal problems, but it also poses risks." Regent University

Human creativity as reflection of divine creativity offers another theological justification. The biblical account of Bezalel in Exodus 31:1-11, whom God filled with the Spirit "with ability and intelligence, with knowledge and all craftsmanship" to build the tabernacle, demonstrates God's affirmation of human technical skill. The Gospel Coalition notes: "When Christians view AI solely as a tool, we can consider it the way Christians have historically responded to technological development: tools are gifts from God, granted under common grace, to be used for good and wise purposes." The Gospel Coalition

The doctrine of imago Dei (image of God) serves as both permission and limitation. While humans alone bear God's image with unique dignity, moral agency, and capacity for relationship with the divine, this very status empowers humans to create tools—including AI. The Singju Post St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology However, the imago Dei also establishes strict boundaries: AI must never be assigned human identity, worth, or moral agency, nor should it undermine authentic human relationships or decision-making that requires spiritual discernment. Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission

Scripture passages most frequently cited in AI discussions include Genesis 1:26-28 (image of God and dominion), Proverbs 3:5-6 (trusting God over human understanding), James 1:5 (asking God for wisdom), Matthew 22:37-39 (loving God and neighbor), Colossians 1:16-17 (Christ's sovereignty over all creation), and Psalm 119:105 (God's Word as lamp and light). These texts ground the Christian approach in divine authority, human responsibility, and the need for wisdom and discernment.

Official Denominational Positions Range from Detailed Guidance to Ongoing Study

The Catholic Church Has Issued the Most Comprehensive Official Statements

On January 28, 2025, the Vatican released "Antiqua et Nova" (Ancient and New), a 117-paragraph document from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Dicastery for Culture and Education, approved by Pope Francis. USCCB This landmark document states that AI "should not be seen as an artificial form of human intelligence, but as a product of it" and that "like any product of human ingenuity, AI can also be directed toward positive or negative ends." National Catholic Reporter The document addresses warfare, healthcare, education, labor, privacy, and fake news, calling for a ban on autonomous lethal weapons and warning against AI power concentration "in the hands of a few powerful companies." Pope Francis addressed the G7 Summit in June 2024—the first papal address specifically on AI to world leaders—emphasizing that "AI is above all else a tool" that must respect human dignity. USCCB

The Church of England Established Official Positions in 2020

The General Synod overwhelmingly approved a motion on work, human dignity, and AI introduced by Bishop Steven Croft of Oxford. The motion affirmed the "dignity and value of purposeful work" amid AI-driven industrial revolution. The Church of England Archbishop Justin Welby signed the Vatican's Rome Call for AI Ethics on behalf of the Church of England, stating: "I am delighted to support the Rome AI Call, which emphasises the dignity of every human being amid technological change." Archbishop of Canterbury Vatican News Bishop Croft serves as the Church's lead bishop on AI in the House of Lords and founded the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation. Bishop Steven's Blog The Church's Ethical Investment Advisory Group has been reviewing AI investments since 2019 for its £12 billion in assets. Voice of America

The Episcopal Church in the United States Launched AskCathy

An AI chatbot developed by Toronto United Church Council's Innovative Ministry Center and TryTank Research Institute at Virginia Theological Seminary in June 2024. Drawing from over 1,000 Episcopal and Anglican sources including the Book of Common Prayer, General Convention documents, and theological works, AskCathy assists lay-led congregations with liturgical planning, explains church polity, suggests prayers, and provides scripture passages and hymn recommendations. Christian Post The 81st General Convention in 2024 passed Resolution D020 establishing a Task Force on AI to review generative AI use in sermon and liturgy writing, investigate best practices, develop guidelines, and examine intellectual property implications. This 10-member task force began work January 1, 2025, and will report to the 82nd General Convention.

The Southern Baptist Convention Produced the Most Detailed Evangelical Statement

Released April 11, 2019, "Artificial Intelligence: An Evangelical Statement of Principles" was signed by nearly 70 evangelical leaders including Russell Moore, J.D. Greear, and multiple seminary presidents. The 12-article statement addresses the image of God, technology as tool, medicine, sexuality, bias, privacy, work, surveillance, autonomous weapons, and public policy. Baptist Press The Gospel Coalition In June 2023, the SBC became the first denomination to adopt a formal resolution on AI at its annual meeting, with approximately 12,800 messengers voting overwhelmingly to affirm that human dignity must be "central to any ethical principles, guidelines, or regulations" for AI.

Mainline Protestant Denominations Are in Active Study Phases

The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) recommended forming a study team in 2024 to examine "responsible use of artificial intelligence," acknowledging AI's "destabilizing potential for employment, the economy, civil governance and global conflict." Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Baptist Press The PC(USA) co-organized the "AI and the Church Summit" in Seattle (August 2024) and "Faithful Futures" summits with Episcopal, ELCA Lutheran, and United Methodist partners. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America published a special issue of the Journal of Lutheran Ethics (August 2024) on "Ethical Considerations on Artificial Intelligence" with discussion guides for congregations, ELCA though no formal denominational statement has been issued. The United Methodist Church appointed an AI Officer and is developing internal AI usage guidelines while participating in ecumenical summits.

The Greek Orthodox Tradition Launched the First Orthodox AI Platform

On October 23, 2025, the Holy Metropolis of Nea Ionia, Greece, in collaboration with HERON ICT Research Laboratory, released "LOGOS" (Λόγος)—an AI platform providing answers based on Holy Scriptures, Holy Fathers, and Orthodox Tradition. GreekReporter.com The platform's official position states: "LOGOS does not replace the role of clergy, pastoral counseling, or the sacramental life of the Church. Instead, it serves as a modern educational assistant." GreekReporter.com The Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America established an AI and Theology Working Group that presented on "Artificial Intelligence, Personhood, and Theosis" at the 2024 Clergy-Laity Congress, exploring theological-philosophical questions rather than issuing formal statements.

Anglican Clergy Are Actively Using AI for Sermon Preparation with Clear Boundaries

Sixty-six percent of church staff now use AI tools at least occasionally, representing an 80% increase from 2023 to 2024, according to the Exponential NEXT State of AI in the Church Survey. Magai Among the 64% of pastors involved in sermon preparation who use AI, the most common applications are research and ideation (27%), text generation (25%), and graphics creation (15%). Magai Exponential ChatGPT leads usage at 25%, followed by Grammarly (13%), Canva Magic (10%), and Google Gemini (9%).

Clergy use AI for sermon preparation in specific ways: generating topic ideas and outlines, finding relevant scriptures and cross-references, researching historical and cultural context, creating illustrations and examples, summarizing commentaries, generating discussion questions, and crafting compelling titles. However, there is near-universal agreement against using AI to write complete sermons. Pastor Jay Cooper of Violet Crown City Church in Texas experimented with a fully AI-generated service in September 2023 and concluded: "Even if it's not as eloquent or if it's a little messy or last minute, it needs to be from the heart of the pastor." Religion News The Christian Post reported the service "lacked spiritual depth" and felt "robotic," with one attendee noting, "I'm not sure that AI can actually express the emotions of love and kindness and empathy." Christian Post

For Anglican clergy specifically, best practices emphasize AI as research assistant rather than primary author. The Episcopal Task Force on AI is developing formal guidelines, but current practice follows these principles: never plagiarize AI content without attribution; verify all AI-generated facts and citations; maintain the personal connection to your specific congregation's needs and stories; preserve the wrestling with Scripture that congregational members expect; and disclose when AI has been used substantively. Very Rev. Andrew McGowan, Dean of Berkeley Divinity School (Yale), notes historical precedent in the Anglican tradition—Thomas Cranmer's Book of Homilies (1547) provided pre-written sermons for clergy—but argues that modern expectations demand authentic, contextual preaching that reflects the pastor's spiritual journey. Reflections

Seminary policies provide additional guidance. Columbia Theological Seminary's April 2024 policy distinguishes between "assistive AI" (grammar checkers, acceptable) and "generative AI" (content creation, requiring attribution). Religion News Columbia Theological Seminary Capital University's Trinity Lutheran Seminary warns that overreliance on AI for assignments undermines spiritual formation, emphasizing that "seminary is not trade school for religious professionals." Capital University

The specialized tool SermonSpark and platforms like Pulpit AI (which transforms sermons into 20+ content pieces) are gaining traction. Navigate The Way offers free AI assistance using ESV and NASB translations specifically for sermon preparation. However, 87% of respondents identify the need for training, with 42% citing lack of training as the biggest barrier to effective AI adoption. Magai Resources like AIforChurchLeaders.com, ChatGPTforChurches.com, and the AI Church Toolkit Podcast (hosted by two Episcopal priests) provide ministry-specific education. AI Church Toolkit

Ethical Concerns Center on Human Dignity, Authenticity, and Theological Accuracy

The Protection of Human Dignity

The protection of human dignity rooted in imago Dei emerges as the paramount concern across all Christian traditions. Houston Christian University states: "The Christian moral tradition is based on the concept of human dignity that is rooted in the imago Dei. This is in contrast to a materialism so prevalent in the fields of science and technology." Houston Christian University Russell Moore of Christianity Today warns: "The crisis of our age is a radical reducing of human life to a flow of data and information, so much so that some tech pioneers suggest eternal life can be achieved by uploading our minds to a digital cloud." Christianity Today

The Crisis of Truth

The crisis of truth particularly troubles Christians committed to biblical authority. AI systems are "stochastic parrots" that generate plausible answers rather than true ones—they have "no concept of true or false, let alone any moral concepts of right or wrong," notes the Lausanne Movement. The Singju Post AI hallucinations pose serious risks: ChatGPT has recommended "eating rocks and cooking spaghetti with glue" based on internet data, and can invent nonexistent Bible verses or false theological claims. Lausanne Movement The Gospel Coalition The Vatican's 2025 document warns about "the growing crisis of truth in public discourse" due to AI's ability to generate "realistic but false information, such as deepfake content and misinformation." USCCB

Bias and Discrimination

Bias and discrimination concern all denominations. The 2019 Evangelical Statement acknowledges: "AI will be inherently subject to bias and these biases must be accounted for, minimized, or removed through continual human oversight and discretion." Baptist Press Research shows AI amplifies existing prejudices—studies found AI content moderation tools were 1.5 times more likely to mark tweets by African-Americans as offensive. As John Lennox notes, "If the ethical programmers are informed by relativistic or biased ethics, the same will be reflected in their products."

Authentic Relationship and Embodiment

Authentic relationship and embodiment cannot be replaced by AI, a concern central to Christianity's incarnational theology. Kate Lucky writes in Christianity Today: "For Christians who believe in a Word that became flesh (John 1:14), relating to AI means missing out on a key aspect of our human identity: embodiment. An AI chatbot can't give us hugs, go for a walk, or share meals at our tables." Christianity Today Gretchen Huizinga of Microsoft Research observes that AI's appeal is avoiding "messy, stinky, unpleasant, annoying people," but "for Christians, God calls us to get into the mess." Christianity Today The Gospel Coalition

Job Displacement and the Meaning of Work

Job displacement and the meaning of work raise theological questions about human purpose. Bishop Steven Croft emphasized in the Church of England's 2020 Synod motion: "For a Christian, work is central for human flourishing and not just an economic issue. We were placed in a garden and charged with a God-given task from the very beginning. Work is related intimately to human dignity and purpose." The Church of England Houston Christian University warns that "as joblessness increases, substance abuse and sexual immorality are also prone to rise as people try to deal with the psychological effects of job losses." Houston Christian University

The Concern About "Playing God"

The concern about "playing God" emerges in discussions of advanced AI. Critics argue that creating human-like intelligence challenges divine authority, raising questions about "the boundaries of human agency and the limits of human creativity in relation to God's sovereignty." Firebrand Magazine The Genesis 3:5 warning against desiring to "be like God, knowing good and evil" and the Tower of Babel narrative (Genesis 11) serve as cautionary tales about technological hubris. The Gospel Coalition However, most theologians distinguish between creating tools within God's created order and usurping divine prerogatives—the former is permitted stewardship, the latter is prohibited pride.

Spiritual Formation and Sanctification Require Human-to-Human Ministry

Christians Establish Clear Boundaries Against AI Replacing Core Spiritual Practices

There is universal consensus that AI cannot validly perform sacraments—baptism requires water and witnessing community, confession requires embodied presence within the human church community, and AI cannot "authentically absolve human sins" according to Catholic theology. The "AI Jesus" confessional hologram installed at St. Peter's Chapel in Lucerne, Switzerland drew fierce criticism as "blasphemous" and "the work of the devil," with scholars noting that "confession and repentance take place within the human community that is the church, a point stressed in the New Testament."

Pastoral Counseling and Spiritual Direction

Pastoral counseling and spiritual direction demand human empathy and discernment that AI cannot provide. Derek Schuurman of Calvin University states: "Pastoral care should be based on a personal incarnate ministry." Calvin Institute of Christian Worship While AI chatbots offer 24/7 availability, they "take us at face value" and lack the capacity to "sniff out the ways that you're lying to yourself," notes Lexie Wu. Gretchen Huizinga adds: "Sometimes godly conviction requires us to feel bad about ourselves in the right way"—something AI cannot discern. Barna data shows 86% believe spiritual counseling is better done by humans, and 84% say the same for mental health counseling. Barna Group Religion News

AI Cannot Replace the Holy Spirit's Work

AI cannot replace the Holy Spirit's work in transformation and sanctification. Dr. Sterling Allen of Global Methodist Church argues: "The failures and shortcomings of AI can have eternal consequences. This potential artificially induced apostasy leads one to wonder if Satan uses AI to distract humans from the work of the Holy Spirit." Firebrand Magazine Joanna Ng, an IBM researcher and Christian, states: "You can't build a life of faith based on information. You need transformation, formation from the people of God and from the Holy Spirit. And you can't replace that." The Singju Post

Character Formation Requires Embodied Community

Character formation requires embodied community, not algorithms. Michael Stephen Burdett asks in Sage Journals: "What becomes of our will and the way that is a central aspect of who we are when the habits are determined more and more by technological platforms that are governed by AI?" Shannon Vallor writes: "I was driven to write this book by a deep moral concern for the future of human character, watching my own moral and intellectual habits be gradually yet profoundly transformed by ever new waves of emerging digital technology." Derek Schuurman emphasizes that "some Christian virtues, like humility, can be learned only in community"—not from interactions with AI.

The Stone Table blog poses the critical test: "If your service could be replicated by an AI as it stands today, then what is the purpose of that church service? Is it not to 'encourage one another,' serve one another, to hold each other accountable and challenge each other by the leading of the Holy Spirit?" An AI service cannot "stop the worship service by the Holy Spirit's conviction and call the congregation to repentance. It cannot pray in faith that God will heal. It cannot manifest any of the gifts of the Spirit for the common good."

Historical Christian Responses to Technology Offer Perspective

Christianity has historically engaged new technologies with both enthusiasm and caution, ultimately integrating innovations that serve gospel mission while maintaining core theological commitments. The printing press (1450s) revolutionized Scripture access, enabling the Reformation and mass biblical literacy—a transformation Christians embraced as fulfilling the goal of putting God's Word in every believer's hands. Radio and television initially sparked debates about whether mediated worship was authentic, but churches eventually adopted broadcasting to expand ministry reach while maintaining that in-person worship remains central. Wikipedia The internet raised concerns about pornography, misinformation, and isolation in the 1990s, yet churches now use websites, streaming, and social media extensively for ministry, having established boundaries around appropriate use.

This pattern reveals consistent principles: Christianity adapts medium while preserving message, uses technology to fulfill the Great Commission and serve neighbor love, establishes ethical boundaries rooted in Scripture and tradition, and emphasizes that tools can amplify ministry but never replace incarnate, Spirit-led community. Christ Over All notes: "The printing press, the telegraph, and the internet all represent revolutionary changes in information, and yet through all these the sovereign God has remained on his throne. We should not be afraid of uncertainty as the revolution of artificial intelligence continues to advance." Christ Over All

Notable Christian scientists and innovators throughout history demonstrate the faith's comfort with technological progress. Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Pascal, and Faraday were devout believers who saw scientific inquiry as exploring God's creation. Institute for Creation Research The monastic tradition contributed significantly to agricultural technology, architecture, and preservation of knowledge. Christian worldview provided philosophical foundations for the scientific revolution, as belief in a rational Creator implied a rationally ordered universe discoverable through investigation. St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology

However, warnings about technological utopianism recur throughout Christian reflection. The faith tradition consistently rejects the notion that technology alone can solve humanity's deepest problems—sin, mortality, meaning, and relationship with God—which require divine grace and spiritual transformation. Each technological wave prompts renewed emphasis on uniquely human capacities: embodiment, authentic relationship, moral discernment, creative will, and spiritual communion with God.

Clear Guidance for Clergy Using AI Sermon Tools

The emerging consensus for Anglican and other clergy offers practical boundaries:

Use AI as research assistant, never as primary author. Think of AI as "an intelligent seminary intern"—capable and helpful but requiring constant oversight and verification. AI can accelerate commentary research, suggest illustrations, identify cross-references, and generate discussion questions, but the theological interpretation, contextual application, and pastoral connection must come from you. Christianity Today

Verify everything before using it. AI hallucinates facts, invents citations, and generates plausible-sounding theology that may be heretical. One pastor reported AI claiming Psalm 151 exists (it doesn't in Protestant Bibles), attributing quotes to scholars who never said them, and conflating different theological traditions. The Gospel Coalition Every scripture reference, historical claim, and theological statement requires verification against authoritative sources.

Maintain transparency with your congregation. While you need not announce every use of a grammar checker, substantive AI assistance in sermon research or content generation should be disclosed. This builds trust and models responsible technology use. Columbia Theological Seminary's policy requires citation when AI generates significant content, and this principle applies to pulpit ministry. Columbia Theological Seminary

Preserve your personal wrestling with Scripture. The spiritual discipline of studying, meditating, praying over, and struggling with biblical texts forms both you and your message. Capital University AI can summarize commentaries efficiently, but it cannot replace the Spirit's work in your own sanctification through Scripture engagement. Your congregation deserves sermons born from your authentic spiritual journey, not algorithmic probability calculations.

Know your congregation's specific needs. Paul Hoffman of Evangelical Friends Church asks pointedly: "Does AI know the stories of your people? Do they know about the miscarriage? Do they know about the divorce? How can an algorithm comprehend lived human experience?" Religion News The most powerful preaching connects Scripture to the particular joys, sorrows, questions, and contexts of the community before you—knowledge AI cannot possess.

Establish clear policies before widespread adoption. Forty-two percent of church leaders cite lack of training as the biggest barrier to AI integration. Magai Work with your vestry, bishop, or denominational leadership to develop guidelines appropriate to your context. The Episcopal Task Force on AI is creating resources that will be available after reporting to the 2025 General Convention. Join the AI Church Toolkit Podcast (hosted by Episcopal priests Mercedes Clements and Peter Levenstrong) or AIforChurchLeaders.com for ongoing education. AI Church Toolkit

For sermon preparation specifically, appropriate AI uses include: generating sermon title options for consideration; suggesting relevant scripture cross-references; researching word meanings in original Greek or Hebrew; finding contemporary illustrations or examples; creating study questions for discussion groups; formatting and organizing research notes; identifying themes across multiple texts; and suggesting visual elements for presentations. Inappropriate uses include: writing the sermon as primary author; making final theological interpretations without human oversight; replacing your personal Bible study and prayer; generating pastoral applications without knowing your congregation; or using AI outputs without verification.

Conclusion: Faithful Engagement Requires Wisdom and Boundaries

Christians are permitted—indeed, encouraged—to use AI as a tool for ministry, but this permission carries profound responsibilities. Across theological traditions, the consensus affirms AI as part of human creative stewardship under God's sovereignty, subject to biblical principles of wisdom, justice, love, and human dignity. The technology offers unprecedented opportunities for efficiency, accessibility, and reach in fulfilling the Great Commission and serving neighbor love.

However, the boundaries are non-negotiable: AI must never be assigned human worth, spiritual authority, or moral agency. It cannot replace authentic human relationships, Spirit-led discernment, or embodied community that forms Christian character. It must not undermine truth-telling, perpetuate injustice, or compromise human dignity. Most critically for clergy, AI cannot write sermons that emerge from personal wrestling with Scripture and intimate knowledge of a specific congregation's needs.

For Anglican clergy and churches, the path forward involves thoughtful integration of AI tools for appropriate tasks—administration, research, translation, accessibility—while zealously guarding the irreplaceable elements of incarnate ministry. The Episcopal Church's Task Force on AI, the Church of England's ongoing engagement, and the broader Anglican via media tradition of balancing innovation with tradition position the communion well to lead faithful AI adoption.

As Bishop Steven Croft emphasized to the Church of England's General Synod, technology must serve human flourishing rooted in theological anthropology: work as divine calling, human dignity as imago Dei, and community as the context for growth in Christian virtues. The Church of England Bishop Steven's Blog The question is not whether Christians may use AI, but how we use it faithfully—with wisdom that comes from fearing the Lord (Proverbs 1:7), discernment trained by constant practice (Hebrews 5:14), and confidence that Christ remains sovereign over all creation, including its most advanced technologies (Colossians 1:16-17).

Back to All FAQs